{"id":264,"date":"2023-04-08T11:48:39","date_gmt":"2023-04-08T11:48:39","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.hfyaman.av.tr\/?page_id=264"},"modified":"2024-01-20T13:03:38","modified_gmt":"2024-01-20T13:03:38","slug":"yayinlar","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/www.hfyaman.av.tr\/?page_id=264","title":{"rendered":"Yay\u0131nlar"},"content":{"rendered":"\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t<\/i>\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

Emsal Kararlar<\/h1>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

<\/p>\n

M\u00fclkiyet Hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130hlali<\/strong><\/h1>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Dava konusu gayrimenkul \u00fczerine mahkemece konulan tedbirin, \u00e7ok uzun s\u00fcre (19 sene) kalmas\u0131 nedeniyle “m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131n\u0131n” ihlal edildi\u011fi sonucuna varm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Anayayasa Mahkemesi\u00a023.07.2020 tarih K:2017\/26532\u00a0<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Bor\u00e7lunun Faizden Sorumlulu\u011fu<\/strong><\/h1>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

“…..Somut uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k; davac\u0131n\u0131n kefil, daval\u0131n\u0131n as\u0131l bor\u00e7lu oldu\u011fu bono nedeniyle ba\u015flat\u0131lan kambiyo senedine \u00f6zg\u00fc icra takibi nedeniyle yap\u0131lan \u00f6demenin tahsili istemiyle ba\u015flat\u0131lan icra takibine itiraz\u0131n iptaline ili\u015fkindir. TBK m.117\/2 gere\u011fince sebepsiz zenginle\u015fmede zenginle\u015fenin iyiniyetli oldu\u011fu haller d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda zenginle\u015fmenin ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011fi tarihte bor\u00e7lunun temerr\u00fcde d\u00fc\u015ft\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn kabul\u00fc gerekir. O halde davac\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6deme yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarihte zenginle\u015fmenin ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011fi ve daval\u0131n\u0131n temerr\u00fcde d\u00fc\u015ft\u00fc\u011f\u00fc g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcne al\u0131narak daval\u0131 bor\u00e7lunun iyiniyetli oldu\u011fu hususu da ispat edilemedi\u011finden i\u015flemi\u015f faiz y\u00f6n\u00fcnden de davan\u0131n kabul\u00fc ile itiraz\u0131n iptaline karar verilmesi gerekirken, bu talebin reddine karar verilmesi do\u011fru olmam\u0131\u015f, bozmay\u0131 gerektirmi\u015ftir….”<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Yarg\u0131tay 11. Hukuk Dairesi\u00a0 \u00a0E:2021\/2826\u00a0 K: 4982\u00a016.06.2022 tarih<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\u0130\u015f Hukukunda \u0130rade Fesad\u0131na Ba\u011fl\u0131 istifa<\/strong><\/h1>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Herhangi bir nedene dayan\u0131lmadan verilen istifa dilek\u00e7esinden 8 y\u0131l sonra a\u00e7\u0131lan davada irade fesad\u0131na dayan\u0131lmas\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Yarg\u0131tay 9. Hukuk Dairesi\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0E: 2016\/12937 K: 2020\/1739\u00a0 tarih<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Tefecilik Su\u00e7u Hk.<\/strong><\/h1>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Tefecilik su\u00e7unda, faizle tefeciden \u00f6d\u00fcn\u00e7 para alan kimse ma\u011fdur de\u011fildir. Bu ki\u015filer su\u00e7 siyaseti gere\u011fi cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmayan hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 ili\u015fkinin taraf\u0131 olup, davaya kat\u0131lma haklar\u0131 yoktur. HAGB a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan zararlar\u0131n\u0131n giderilmesi de aranamaz.\u00a0<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Yarg\u0131tay 9. Ceza Dairesi\u00a0 tarih:\u00a016.6.2021\u00a0E: 2021\/749 K: 2021\/3171<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Dava Dilek\u00e7esinin Tebli\u011f<\/strong><\/h1>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\u0130cra takibine maruz kalan bor\u00e7lu, vekil marifetiyle takibe itiraz etti\u011finde, itiraz \u00fczerine duran icra takibinin devam\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flamak i\u00e7in alacakl\u0131n\u0131n a\u00e7aca\u011f\u0131 itiraz\u0131n iptali davas\u0131nda dava dilek\u00e7esinin as\u0131la tebli\u011f edilmesi gerekir.\u00a0<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Yarg\u0131tay \u0130\u00e7tihad\u0131 Birle\u015ftirme B\u00fcy\u00fck Genel Kurulu\u00a0\u00a0Esas:2021\/1\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0Karar: 2022\/3\u00a0tarih:03.06.2022<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Eski Kirac\u0131ya Bedel Tespit Davalar\u0131nda Hakkaniyet \u0130ndirimi<\/strong><\/h1>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Mahkemece bu bedelden daval\u0131n\u0131n\u00a0 eski kirac\u0131 oldu\u011fu g\u00f6zetilerek %5- % 20 oran\u0131nda hakkaniyete uygun bir miktarda indirim yap\u0131ld\u0131ktan sonra kira bedelinin tespiti gerekirken, yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde d\u00fc\u015f\u00fck miktarda hak ve nesafet indirimi yap\u0131larak h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131 usul ve yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131 olup bozmay\u0131 gerektirmi\u015ftir<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Yarg\u0131tay 3. Hukuk Dairesi 2017\/5031 E. , 2019\/489 K.<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

Tahliye Davalar\u0131nda 30 g\u00fcnl\u00fck s\u00fcre<\/strong><\/h1>\n

TBK 315 uyar\u0131nca a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015f icra takibinde bor\u00e7luya \u00f6demesi i\u00e7in 30 g\u00fcn s\u00fcre verilmi\u015ftir. Bor\u00e7lu 7 g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde itiraz etmi\u015f olsa bile itiraz\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 davas\u0131 i\u00e7in 30 g\u00fcn beklenmelidir. Bor\u00e7lunun itiraz\u0131 dava a\u00e7ma s\u00fcresini etkilemez.<\/p>\n

(Yarg\u0131tay 6. HD; 2015\/10497 E., 2016\/2720 K.)<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

\u0130cra \u0130flas Dairelerince Bor\u00e7ludan Tahsil Edilen Paralar\u0131n Nemas\u0131n\u0131n Hazineye Ait Olmas\u0131n\u0131 \u00d6ng\u00f6ren Kural\u0131n \u0130ptali<\/strong><\/h1>\n

Anayasa Mahkemesinin bu karar\u0131nda cebri icra s\u00fcrecinde tahsil edilen paran\u0131n de\u011ferinin korunmas\u0131na y\u00f6nelik olarak yap\u0131lan de\u011ferlendirmenin mahkemelere ve Cumhuriyet savc\u0131l\u0131klar\u0131na herhangi bir sebeple \u00f6zel hukuk ki\u015fileri taraf\u0131ndan verilen paralar y\u00f6n\u00fcnden de ge\u00e7erli oldu\u011fu a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r.<\/p>\n

Bor\u00e7ludan tahsil edilen para d\u00e2hil olmak \u00fczere mahkemeler, h\u00e2kimler, Cumhuriyet savc\u0131lar\u0131 ve icra iflas dairelerine verilen paralar\u0131n enflasyon kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda de\u011fer yitirmesini \u00f6nlemeye y\u00f6nelik bir tedbir olarak vadeli mevduat hesab\u0131na yat\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 neticesinde elde edilen neman\u0131n Hazineye irat kaydedilmesi kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131ks\u0131z yararlanma h\u00fckm\u00fcnde olup bunun herhangi bir hakl\u0131 temeli bulunmamaktad\u0131r. Devletin zorlay\u0131c\u0131 nedenler olmaks\u0131z\u0131n \u00f6zel bir ki\u015finin mal varl\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131ks\u0131z yararlanmas\u0131 d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fclemez. Devletin sundu\u011fu yarg\u0131 ve takip hizmetleri kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda zaten har\u00e7 al\u0131nmakta, ayr\u0131ca yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama ve takip giderleri de ilgili taraflardan tahsil edilmektedir. Bu durumda bankaya yat\u0131r\u0131lan paran\u0131n nemas\u0131n\u0131n Hazineye irat kaydedilmesinin sunulan yarg\u0131 ve takip hizmetlerinin giderinin k\u0131smen ilgililere y\u00fckletilmesi amac\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131 da s\u00f6ylenemez. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla mahkemeler, h\u00e2kimler, Cumhuriyet savc\u0131lar\u0131 ve icra iflas dairelerine tevdi edilen ve \u00f6zel hukuk ki\u015filerine ait olan paralar\u0131n nemas\u0131n\u0131n Hazineye intikal ettirilmesinin anayasal a\u00e7\u0131dan me\u015fru bir amaca dayanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu do\u011frultuda kural\u0131n m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131n\u0131 ihlal etti\u011fi sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n

Anayasa Mahkemesi a\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle kural\u0131n Anayasa\u2019ya ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011funa ve iptaline karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

Anayasa Mahkemesi 5\/4\/2023 tarihinde E.2023\/48 numaral\u0131 karar\u0131<\/p>\n

Kiraya Verenin M\u00fclk Sahibi de\u011filse Tahliye Taah\u00fcd\u00fc ge\u00e7ersizdir<\/h1>\n

Kiraya veren durumunda olmayan malikin tahliye taahh\u00fcd\u00fcne dayal\u0131 olarak tahliye davas\u0131 a\u00e7ma hakk\u0131 yoktur.”<\/p>\n

Yarg\u0131tay 6. Hukuk Dairesi 2015\/9993 E.<\/p>\n

\u0130nternet Al\u0131\u015fveri\u015f Siteleri Sat\u0131lan \u00fcr\u00fcnlerin ay\u0131pl\u0131 olmas\u0131ndan sat\u0131c\u0131 ile birlikte Sorumluludur.<\/h1>\n

er ne kadar sat\u0131c\u0131 olmasa da t\u00fcketici ile do\u011frudan muhatap olduklar\u0131 ve \u00f6zellikle t\u00fcketicinin yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00f6demeyi tahsil ettikleri gerek\u00e7esiyle internet al\u0131\u015fveri\u015f platformlar\u0131n\u0131n sat\u0131lan \u00fcr\u00fcndeki ay\u0131ptan sat\u0131c\u0131yla birlikte sorumlu oldu\u011fu sonucuna var\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131<\/p>\n

Yarg\u0131tay 11. HD,3467\/6446)<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

TANIK L\u0130STES\u0130 NE ZAMAN SUNULUR ?<\/h1>\n

Dava dilek\u00e7esinde tan\u0131k deliline dayanan taraf\u0131n tensiple tan\u0131k listesi sunmas\u0131 talep edilemez. Bu husus \u00f6n incleme a\u015famas\u0131ndan sonra de\u011ferlendirilebilecektir. Yarg\u0131tay Hukuk Genel Kurulu 2020\/9-605 Esas 2022\/294 Karar<\/p>\n

<\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

Belirsiz Alacak – K\u0131smi Dava Ayr\u0131m\u0131<\/strong><\/h1>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Dava dilek\u00e7esinde fazlaya ili\u015fkin haklar\u0131n sakl\u0131 tutuldu\u011funun belirtilmi\u015f, davan\u0131n belirsiz alacak davas\u0131 olarak a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n belirtilmemi\u015f olmas\u0131 davan\u0131n niteli\u011fini k\u0131smi dava k\u0131lar.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Yarg\u0131tay Hukuk Genel Kurulu \u00a02021\/485 Esas \u00a02021\/971 Karar<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\u0130\u015f\u00e7iye Tebligat<\/strong><\/h1>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Sigortas\u0131z olarak \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan i\u015f\u00e7iye yap\u0131lan tebligat, usul\u00fcne uygundur; tebligat\u0131n yap\u0131labilmesi i\u00e7in i\u015f\u00e7inin daim\u00ee olarak \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmas\u0131 yeterlidir.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Yarg\u0131tay Hukuk Genel Kurulu\u00a0E: 2017\/2155, K: 2021\/874<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\u0130ntifadan Men \u0130spat Hususu<\/strong><\/h1>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Bu nedenle, davaya konu ta\u015f\u0131nmazlar y\u00f6n\u00fcnden say\u0131lan istisnalar d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda intifadan men ko\u015fulunun ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmesi aranacak ve intifadan men ko\u015fulunun ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011fi iddias\u0131, her t\u00fcrl\u00fc delille kan\u0131tlanabilecektir. (Yarg\u0131tay Hukuk Genel Kurulunun 27.02.2002 g\u00fcn ve 2002\/3-131 E, 2002\/114 K say\u0131l\u0131 ilam\u0131) \u2026\u201d (Yarg\u0131tay 1. H.D. 09.06.2016, 2015\/3581 E. \u2013 2016\/7039 K.)<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Islahta Faiz \u0130stenmemi\u015fse Bile Faize Karar Verilebilir<\/strong><\/h1>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

bir miktar para alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n faizi ile birlikte tahsiline karar verilmesinin talep edildi\u011fi k\u0131smi davada, dava konusu miktar\u0131n k\u0131smi \u0131slahla faiz talebi belirtilmeksizin art\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 halinde, art\u0131r\u0131lan miktar bak\u0131m\u0131ndan dava dilek\u00e7esindeki faiz talebine ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak faize h\u00fckmedilece\u011fine<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Yarg\u0131tay \u0130\u00e7tihad\u0131 Birle\u015ftirme B\u00fcy\u00fck Genel Kurulu 2017\/8 E. 2019\/3 K. 24\/05\/2019 Tarih<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

\n
\n

Sahte Faturadan Dolay\u0131 \u00d6zel Usuls\u00fczl\u00fck cezas\u0131 kesilemeyece\u011fi\u00a0<\/strong><\/h1>\n
Emtia al\u0131mlar\u0131n\u0131n sahte faturalarla belgelendirilmesi; VUK 353. maddesinde \u00f6zel usuls\u00fczl\u00fck cezas\u0131 kesilmesini gerektiren fiilerden say\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in, sahte fatura kullan\u0131m\u0131ndan kesilen \u00f6zel usuls\u00fczl\u00fck cezas\u0131 hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131d\u0131r Dan\u0131\u015ftay 3. Daire K:2021\/5247<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\u00a0<\/div>\n
\u00a0<\/div>\n

Konut Kira s\u00f6zle\u015fmelerinde 10 y\u0131ll\u0131k s\u00fcre<\/strong><\/h1>\n
Hali haz\u0131rda mevcut kirac\u0131yla kira s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi yenilenerek yeni ba\u015flang\u0131\u00e7 tarihli kira s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi imzalan\u0131rsa, TBK 347’deki 10 Y\u0131ll\u0131k S\u00fcre yeni imzalanan s\u00f6zle\u015fmede yer alan tarihten itibaren ba\u015flar.<\/div>\n
Yarg\u0131tay Hukuk Genel Kurulu; 2021\/614 K<\/div>\n
\u00a0<\/div>\n
\u00a0<\/div>\n

Davan\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarih, harc\u0131n yat\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarih de\u011fil, dilek\u00e7enin UYAP\u2019a kaydedildi\u011fi tarihtir<\/strong><\/h1>\n

1.Somut olay de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde; hakem heyeti karar\u0131n\u0131n davac\u0131 tarafa 21.02.2022 tarihinde tebli\u011f edildi\u011fi, davac\u0131 vekilinin hakem heyetine karar\u0131n\u0131n iptali istemiyle g\u00f6nderdi\u011fi dava dilek\u00e7esinin UYAP ortam\u0131nda 08.03.2022 tarihinde kaydedilmi\u015f oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.
2.Her ne kadar \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesince, dava a\u00e7\u0131l\u0131\u015f tevzi formunda yer alan 09.03.2022 tarihinin esas al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi belirtilmi\u015f ise de, yukar\u0131da detayl\u0131 olarak a\u00e7\u0131klanan HMK\u2019n\u0131n 118 ve 445 ile B\u00f6lge Adliye ve Adl\u00ee Yarg\u0131 \u0130lk Derece Mahkemeleri ile Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131klar\u0131 \u0130dar\u00ee ve Yaz\u0131 \u0130\u015fleri Hizmetlerinin Y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmesine Dair Y\u00f6netmelik\u2019in 5\/10 uncu maddesi gere\u011fince dava dilek\u00e7esinin Uyap ortam\u0131nda kaydedildi\u011fi tarih olan 08.03.2022 tarihinde davan\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011funun kabul\u00fc gerekmektedir.<\/p>\n

Yarg\u0131tay 3. Hukuk Dairesi 2022\/8184 E. , 2023\/27 K.<\/div>\n
\u00a0<\/div>\n
\u00a0<\/div>\n

Vadesi Gelmeyen Bonolar\u0131n Muaccel Olmas\u0131<\/strong><\/h1>\n
\n
Senetlerin birinin vadesinde \u00f6denmemesi halinde di\u011fer senetlerin muaccel olaca\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin taraflar aras\u0131nda ayr\u0131ca bir s\u00f6zle\u015fme yap\u0131lmas\u0131 ve s\u00f6zle\u015fme ile bonolara a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a at\u0131fta bulunulmas\u0131 halinde muacceliyet ko\u015fulu ge\u00e7erli olacakt\u0131r.<\/div>\n
Yarg\u0131tay 12. Hukuk Dairesi 2023\/1850 K.<\/div>\n
\u00a0<\/div>\n

\u0130cra Takibiyle Tahliye<\/strong><\/h1>\n
Kira bedelinin icra dosyas\u0131na yat\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 halinde temerr\u00fct olgusu ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmeyece\u011finden ve alacakl\u0131n\u0131n icra giderlerine ili\u015fkin olarak takibe devam\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcn oldu\u011fundan tahliye isteminin reddi gerekmektedir.<\/div>\n
\n
Yarg\u0131tay 12. Hukuk Dairesi 2023\/793 Esas<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

Bozma Karar\u0131ndan Sonra Islah Yap\u0131lamayaca\u011f\u0131 Gerek\u00e7esiyle Islah Talebinin Reddedilmesi Nedeniyle Mahkemeye Eri\u015fim Hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130hlal Edilmesi<\/strong><\/h1>\n

Anayasa Mahkemesi Genel Kurulu 15\/2\/2023 tarihinde,\u00a0Ziynet Benli\u00a0<\/em><\/a>(B. No: 2019\/23977) ba\u015fvurusunda Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 36. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131 ile makul s\u00fcrede yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Tahliye Taahh\u00fcd\u00fc takibine yap\u0131lan aile konutu \u0130tiraz\u0131\u00a0 <\/strong><\/h1>\n

itiraz; en ge\u00e7 takip tarihine kadar s\u00f6zle\u015fmede imzas\u0131 olmayan di\u011fer e\u015f, malike mecurun aile konutu oldu\u011fu hususunda bildirimde bulunmam\u0131\u015fsa aile konutu itiraz\u0131 dinlenilmez<\/p>\n

Antalya BAM 6 HD 2022\/1054-1010 24.05.2022<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

Enflasyon Sebebiyle Alacak Zarara U\u011fram\u0131\u015fsa<\/strong><\/h1>\n

2 ay s\u00fcren haks\u0131z tutuklama nedeniyle a\u00e7\u0131lan tazminat davas\u0131nda h\u00fckmedilen 6000 bin TL manevi tazminat\u0131n yetersiz olmas\u0131 nedeniyle ba\u015fvurucunun ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131 ihlal edilmi\u015f olup ba\u015fvurucuya 44 bin TL manevi tazminat \u00f6denmesi gerek.<\/p>\n

Anayasa Mahkemesi 2020\/22730<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

Tenkis ve Muvaza Davas\u0131<\/strong><\/h1>\n

Tenkis davas\u0131 ile muvazaa davas\u0131 birlikte a\u00e7\u0131labilece\u011fi gibi tenkis davas\u0131ndan sonra ba\u015fka bir davada muvazaaya dayal\u0131 tapu iptal tescil davas\u0131 da a\u00e7\u0131labilir.<\/p>\n

Yarg\u0131tay \u0130BBGK 1986\/4 E<\/p>\n

\u0130CRA M\u00dcD\u00dcRL\u00dc\u011e\u00dc HATALI \u0130\u015eLEM TAZM\u0130NAT ?<\/span><\/h1>\n

icra m\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn hatal\u0131 i\u015flemine kar\u015f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lan tazminat davas\u0131n\u0131n reddedilmesi nedeniyle m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi karar\u0131 verildi. Ba\u015fvuru No: 2019\/5680 Karar Tarihi: 30.03.2023 RG Tarihi: 10.10.2023<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

AVUKATIN KUSURU<\/h1>\n

Avukat\u0131n kusurlu eylemi olmasayd\u0131 dahi takip edilen i\u015f ayn\u0131 \u015fekilde sonu\u00e7lanacak nitelikteyse avukat\u0131n eylemine ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak do\u011fmu\u015f bir zarar\u0131n varl\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan bahsedilemeyecektir. Yarg\u0131tay Kararlar\u0131 Hukuk Genel Kurulu 2022\/699 E. 2023\/852 K.<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

Yenileme s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinde kira bedeli emsal ve rayi\u00e7lere uygun de\u011fil ise yenileme s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin imzalanmas\u0131ndan itibaren 5 y\u0131l ge\u00e7memi\u015f olsa dahi ilk s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin ba\u015flang\u0131c\u0131na g\u00f6re ge\u00e7en s\u00fcre g\u00f6zetilerek kira paras\u0131n\u0131n tespiti talep edilebilir. Yarg\u0131tay 3 HD 2017\/5411 E 2018\/11236 K<\/h1>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

Kirac\u0131n\u0131n elektrik borcundan ev sahibi sorumlu mudur? Ev sahibi yeni bir abonelik a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 isteyebilir mi?<\/h1>\n

Perakende sat\u0131\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi yap\u0131l\u0131rken talepte bulunandan elektrik borcunun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6sterir borcu yoktur belgesinin istenemeyece\u011fi, ayn\u0131 kullan\u0131m yerine ait \u00f6nceki abonenin t\u00fcketimlerinden kaynaklanan bor\u00e7lar\u0131 yeni abonelik isteyenin \u00fcstlenmesinin talep edilemeyece\u011fi, bu haliyle elektrik aboneli\u011fi tesisinin \u00f6nceki abonenin borcu nedeni ile geri \u00e7evrilemeyece\u011fi a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r.<\/p>\n

Yarg\u0131tay 3. Hukuk Dairesi
2022\/8551 Esas2023\/1883\u00a0Karar<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

Yarg\u0131lama giderinde idarenin sorumlulu\u011fu<\/h1>\n

Davada “incelenmeksizin ret” karar\u0131 verilse de davan\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131na daval\u0131 idare sebebiyet verdi\u011finden, yarg\u0131lama giderlerinin daval\u0131 taraf \u00fczerinde b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131 ve davac\u0131 lehine vekalet \u00fccretine h\u00fckmedilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n

\u0130stanbul B\u0130M 6. VDD 2020\/2751 Esas<\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

\u0130\u015e\u00c7\u0130N\u0130N SIK SIK RAPOR ALMASI<\/h1>\n

L\u0130\u015f\u00e7inin s\u0131k s\u0131k rapor almas\u0131 ile i\u015f yerindeki \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma d\u00fczeninin bozuldu\u011fu, i\u015flerin aksad\u0131\u011f\u0131, vardiyalar\u0131n kayd\u0131\u011f\u0131 vb. durumlar\u0131n s\u00f6z konusu olmas\u0131 halinde feshin ge\u00e7erli nedenle feshedilebilece\u011fi ..\u201d\u00a0<\/span>YARGITAY 9. HD\u00a0<\/span>E 2011\/27132\u00a0<\/span>K 2013\/23726<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

\u0130HYAT\u0130 HAC\u0130Z TAHS\u0130L HARCI ALINMAZ<\/h1>\n

\u0130htiyati haciz, icra-i hacze d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015fmedi\u011finden ihtiyati hacizlerin fekki ve teminat mektubunun iadesi s\u0131ras\u0131nda tahsil harc\u0131 al\u0131namaz. Yarg\u0131tay 12. Hukuk Dairesi 2022\/12207 Esas 2023\/3912 Karar<\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

SATI\u015e HARCI EKS\u0130KL\u0130K TAMAMLANMASI<\/h1>\n

Her ne kadar icra m\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnce davac\u0131 taraf\u0131n sat\u0131\u015f yap\u0131lmas\u0131 talebi gerekli masraf\u0131n 08\/03\/2023 tarihine kadar yat\u0131r\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve haczin d\u00fc\u015ft\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden bahisle ret edilmi\u015f ise de, davac\u0131n\u0131n haciz tarihinin 03\/02\/2016 tarihi oldu\u011fu, bu durumda \u0130\u0130K’nun ge\u00e7ici 18\/2-1. bendi uyar\u0131nca ge\u00e7i\u015f tarihinden \u00f6nce haczedilen mallar hakk\u0131nda de\u011fi\u015fikliklerden \u00f6nceki h\u00fck\u00fcmler ile ilga edilen h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin uygulanmas\u0131na devam olunaca\u011f\u0131, bu durumda icra m\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc taraf\u0131ndan eksik olan avans\u0131n tespit edilerek davac\u0131ya yat\u0131rmas\u0131 i\u00e7in s\u00fcre verilmesi gerekirken talebin reddine karar verilmesinin, yine Mahkemece \u015fikayetin kabul\u00fcne karar verilmesi gerekirken \u015fikayetin reddine karar verilmesinin yerinde olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131-
Kayseri B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 5. HD. 05.09.2023 T.\u00a0E:1046,\u00a0K:\u00a01023<\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

MAHKEME SONUCU DE\u011e\u0130\u015eMEYECEKSE \u0130HMAL OLMAZ<\/h1>\n

Yarg\u0131tay Ceza Genel Kurulu Esas : 2019\/184 Karar : 2020\/497 03.12.2020 Tarihli kararda; “Avukat\u0131n – M\u00fcdafiinin s\u00fcresi i\u00e7erisinde istinaf yahut temyiz kanun yoluna ba\u015fvurmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, s\u00fcreyi ka\u00e7\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131 sebebiyle g\u00f6revi ihmal su\u00e7undan m\u00fcvekkil her ne kadar \u015fik\u00e2yet\u00e7i olmu\u015f ise de; “Avukat\u0131n ba\u015fvurmas\u0131 gereken temyiz veya istinaf merciine, normal \u015fartlar alt\u0131nda ba\u015fvuru yap\u0131lsa idi sonu\u00e7 de\u011fi\u015fecek miydi?” sorusu sorulacak ve durum ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lacakt\u0131r. Gelecek cevabi yaz\u0131da sonu\u00e7 de\u011fi\u015fmeyece\u011fi yani m\u00fcvekkkilin\/\u015fik\u00e2yet\u00e7inin hukuki durumunda bir de\u011fi\u015fiklik olmayaca\u011f\u0131, h\u00e2li ile zarar olu\u015fmayacak ise Avukat\u0131n Beraatine karar verilmesi gerekmektedir.”\u00a0denilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

Avukat\u0131n \u00d6zen Y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc\u00a0<\/span><\/h1>\n

Maddi Tazminat Talebinin Islah\u0131 – Islaha Kar\u015f\u0131 Zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 Def’inin Kabul\u00fc – Avukat\u0131n Zarardan Sorumlulu\u011fu<\/span> Dava konusu uyu\u015fmazl\u0131kta, daval\u0131 avukat i\u015f g\u00f6remezlik oran\u0131 ile ilgili kesin tespiti i\u00e7eren Adli T\u0131p Kurumu raporundan sonra maddi tazminat talebini \u0131slah etmi\u015ftir. Ne var ki zarar\u0131n \u00f6\u011frenilmesi an\u0131 ile ilgili olarak yukar\u0131da de\u011finilen farkl\u0131 de\u011ferlendirmelerin varl\u0131\u011f\u0131,<\/span> mahkemenin uzam\u0131\u015f zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcresini olay an\u0131ndan ba\u015flatan de\u011ferlendirmesi ve bu de\u011ferlendirmenin \u00d6zel Daire karar\u0131yla yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclmesi sonucu daval\u0131n\u0131n \u0131slaha kar\u015f\u0131 zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 def’inde bulunmas\u0131 \u00fczerine \u0131slah ile art\u0131r\u0131lan k\u0131sma ili\u015fkin maddi tazminat talebi reddedilmi\u015ftir. Bu h\u00e2lde avukat\u0131n \u00f6zen borcuna ayk\u0131r\u0131 eyleminden ve bu eylem ile do\u011fdu\u011fu iddia olunan zarar aras\u0131nda illiyet ba\u011f\u0131n\u0131n bulundu\u011fundan bahsedilemez.<\/span> Aksi y\u00f6ndeki bir kabul hukuki de\u011ferlendirmedeki bu yorum farkl\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n olumsuz neticelerinin avukata y\u00fcklenmesi<\/span> sonucunu do\u011furacakt\u0131r. Yarg\u0131tay Hukuk Genel Kurulu 2022\/109 Esas 2023\/439 Karar<\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Emsal Kararlar M\u00fclkiyet Hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130hlali Dava konusu gayrimenkul \u00fczerine mahkemece konulan tedbirin, \u00e7ok uzun s\u00fcre (19 sene) kalmas\u0131 nedeniyle “m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131n\u0131n” ihlal edildi\u011fi sonucuna varm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Anayayasa Mahkemesi\u00a023.07.2020 tarih K:2017\/26532\u00a0 \u00a0 Bor\u00e7lunun Faizden Sorumlulu\u011fu “…..Somut uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k; davac\u0131n\u0131n kefil, daval\u0131n\u0131n as\u0131l bor\u00e7lu oldu\u011fu bono nedeniyle ba\u015flat\u0131lan kambiyo senedine \u00f6zg\u00fc icra takibi nedeniyle yap\u0131lan \u00f6demenin tahsili istemiyle ba\u015flat\u0131lan …<\/p>\n

Yay\u0131nlar<\/span> Devam\u0131 »<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"_uag_custom_page_level_css":"","site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","_joinchat":[],"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-264","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"uagb_featured_image_src":{"full":false,"thumbnail":false,"medium":false,"medium_large":false,"large":false,"1536x1536":false,"2048x2048":false},"uagb_author_info":{"display_name":"FurkanYaman","author_link":"https:\/\/www.hfyaman.av.tr\/?author=1"},"uagb_comment_info":0,"uagb_excerpt":"Emsal Kararlar M\u00fclkiyet Hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130hlali Dava konusu gayrimenkul \u00fczerine mahkemece konulan tedbirin, \u00e7ok uzun s\u00fcre (19 sene) kalmas\u0131 nedeniyle “m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131n\u0131n” ihlal edildi\u011fi sonucuna varm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Anayayasa Mahkemesi\u00a023.07.2020 tarih K:2017\/26532\u00a0 \u00a0 Bor\u00e7lunun Faizden Sorumlulu\u011fu “…..Somut uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k; davac\u0131n\u0131n kefil, daval\u0131n\u0131n as\u0131l bor\u00e7lu oldu\u011fu bono nedeniyle ba\u015flat\u0131lan kambiyo senedine \u00f6zg\u00fc icra takibi nedeniyle yap\u0131lan \u00f6demenin tahsili istemiyle ba\u015flat\u0131lan…","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.hfyaman.av.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/264","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.hfyaman.av.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.hfyaman.av.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.hfyaman.av.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.hfyaman.av.tr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=264"}],"version-history":[{"count":49,"href":"https:\/\/www.hfyaman.av.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/264\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":665,"href":"https:\/\/www.hfyaman.av.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/264\/revisions\/665"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.hfyaman.av.tr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=264"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}